Bids must be submitted by the stipulated time to the email address stipulated above. Late bids will not be accepted for consideration. The maximum number of suppliers to be awarded this rfq is 13. The 80/20 preferential point system will be used to evaluate price and specific goal on received written price quotations. Where 80 will be allocated for price and 20 for the specific goals. Failure to price all items will result to disqualification. The supplier warrants that all goods and services supplied under this purchase order will be in accordance with all contract requirements in terms of the purchase and free from defects or inferior materials, equipment, and workmanship for twelve 12 months after final acceptance of the goods or services.
The delivery time or date stated in the purchase order shall be regarded as fixed and the supplier shall adhere strictly thereto. The delivery time or date stated in the purchase order shall be regarded as fixed and the supplier shall adhere strictly thereto.
Payments shall be effected within 30 days after submission of monthly statement. Payments shall be effected within 30 days after submission of monthly statement.
The supplier warrants that all goods and services supplied under this purchase order will be in accordance with all contract requirements in terms of the purchase and free from defects or inferior materials, equipment, and workmanship for twelve 12 months after final acceptance of the goods or services. he supplier warrants that all goods and services supplied under this purchase order will be in accordance with all contract requirements in terms of the purchase and free from defects or inferior materials, equipment, and workmanship for twelve 12 months after final acceptance of the goods or services.
The rfq will be evaluated based on the criterion below: test for responsiveness pre qualification, functionality criteria, and preferential point system. he rfq will be evaluated based on the criterion below: 3. 1. test for responsiveness pre qualification 3. 1. 1. iso **** accredited laboratory responses that fail to meet prequalifying criteria stipulated will not be further evaluated. 3. 2. functionality criteria 3. 2. 1. the functionality evaluation criteria are as follows: adjudication criteria weight previous related experience similar to current rfq scopework the rating of this item is based on a fourpoint scale: 1. 25 none 0 no submission weak 33. 3 1 company reference moderate 66. 7 2 company references good 100 3 company references human resource capacity adjudicated based on human resource capacity schedule required for the execution of the scope of work. the purpose is to establish an overall picture of the companys human resource capacity and ability to undertake the work. the rating of this item is based on a fourpoint scale: 2. none 0 no submission 25 weak 33. 3 company organogram not reflecting the resource needs for the scope of work moderate 66. 7 company organogram partially addressing the resource needs for the scope of work good 100 company organogram adequately addressing the resource needs for the scope of work equipment resource capacity adjudicated based on equipment resource capacity plant, equipment, vehicles, computers, softwares etc. the purpose is to establish an overall picture of the companys equipment resource capacity and ability to undertake the work and will therefore be servicesgoods specific. 3. 25 the rating of this item is based on a fourpoint scale: none 0 no submission weak 33. 3 minimal capacity in relation to the scope moderate 66. 7 capacity meets the scope requirements with some gaps good 100 capacity meets the scope requirements work breakdown schedule project programme aligned with contractual requirements, credible and acceptable the rating of this item is based on a fourpoint scale: none 0 no submission 4. 25 weak 33. 3 the work breakdown schedule project programme is submitted but is unclear. moderate 66. 7 the work breakdown schedule project programme is submitted and has some indication of the duration. good 100 the work breakdown schedule project programme is submitted and has a clear indication of the duration and delivery date. total 100 responses are required to meet a minimum of 70 percent to be further evaluated. 3. 3. preferential point system the **** preferential point system will be used to evaluate price and specific goal on received written price quotations. where 80 will be allocated for price and 20 for the specific goals.
Responses that fail to meet prequalifying criteria stipulated will not be further evaluated. iso **** accredited laboratory responses that fail to meet prequalifying criteria stipulated will not be further evaluated.
Should the supplier fail to perform and make delivery in terms of the purchase order, exception of force majeure specified in clause 8. 13, rand water shall be entitled to impose a penalty, which shall be deducted from the payment statement. should the supplier fail to perform and make delivery in terms of the purchase order, exception of force majeure specified in clause 8. 13, rand water shall be entitled to impose a penalty, which shall be deducted from the payment statement.